Background Inpatient psychiatry is largely oriented toward cure and symptom remission. For people with severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI), such as treatment resistant schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, severe depression, personality disorders and dementia, this focus often falls short. Palliative psychiatry prioritises quality of life, dignity and meaning rather than cure it is established in somatic medicine but barely implemented in psychiatric settings. This study examined which contents, goals and limits a palliative psychological approach can define for inpatient care, and how an integrative, interdisciplinary concept can be developed.
Methods A qualitative, exploratory design was used. Eight semi structured expert interviews with professionals from psychiatry, psychology, nursing and hospice care, plus a family caregiver, were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis with a combined deductive inductive category system, supported by intercoder checks and communicative validation.
Results Palliative psychological approaches were barely established, with fragmented, individual dependent efforts and conceptual confusion, as palliative was often misread as end of life care only. Key barriers were staff shortages, placement and financing gaps, professional resistance and ethical dilemmas, including autonomy, advance directives and chronic suicidality. Success factors were interdisciplinary collaboration, continuity and relationship based care, family integration, and psychosocial interventions such as biography work and music therapy.
Conclusions A shift from cure toward quality of life and autonomy appears necessary and feasible. Findings informed a seven-module integrative concept covering structured indication, existential and psychotherapeutic support, family integration, daily structure and continuity, spiritual and cultural support, an interdisciplinary team with supervision, and cross sector transition management. The concept supports participatory piloting with evaluation.